A score you can open

A ranking without an explanation is a wager, not decision support. Here is what our scores contain and what they do not.

  • An explicit formula, never an opaque ranking
  • Every assessment points to its CV extract
  • The recruiter confirms every decision
Norvia Analytics/Decision dossierFictional example
Thomas RenaudSenior data scientist · Norvia Analytics
Final score79

How the score is calculated

  1. Base scorecriteria evidenced in the CV82
  2. Preference bonusproduct-team experience× 1.02
  3. Quality coefficientdeployment ownership to clarify× 0.95

Scoring commentary

Relevant Python and SQL experience E1. Deployment ownership to clarify in the interview E2.

Illustration of the interface with fictional data.
Vigilance signal

Career gap · Jul 2024 — Feb 2025. Nothing is inferred for this period.

Screening in progress

An assessment can be decomposed

The mandate criterion, supporting evidence and item to verify remain visible together.

Mandate criterion

Deploying models to production

Evidence found

CV · page 3 · experience

Worked with the platform team to deploy forecasting models and monitor their performance for a product team.

01Evidence found
The useful sentence is extracted and remains connected to its original page.
02Assessment
The experience matches the kind of production deployment required by the mandate.
03To verify
The candidate’s personal share of the deployment still needs to be explored in the interview.

Relevant profiles

Evidence retains its source

Each synthetic extract shows the expected link between an assertion and its source document.

Worked with the platform team to deploy forecasting models and monitor their performance.

Connected criterion:Criterion — Model deployment (personal share to confirm)

CV · page 3 · experience 2020-2024

Developed forecasting models in Python and SQL pipelines for a product team.

Connected criterion:Criterion — Python and SQL used in production

CV · page 2 · experience 2021-2024

Examples on this page are fictional and contain no real candidate data.

Who decides

The system prepares. The recruiter decides.

Missing evidence becomes a question. It does not automatically become a rejection.

  1. 01

    Proposal

    The system connects an extract to a criterion.

    OutputAn extract linked to a criterion

  2. 02

    Verification

    The recruiter checks the source and qualifies the interpretation.

    OutputThe source opened and nuanced

  3. 03

    Decision

    The recruiter confirms the selected profiles and delivered dossier.

    OutputProfiles and dossier approved

Traceability

Sensitive operations must be auditable

Expected governance covers criterion changes, validations and transmissions.

  • Criteria changes

    Changes to the reading grid are designed to be traced with their author.

    Scope set in the contract
  • Approvals

    Confirming or nuancing an assessment is designed to leave a trace in the dossier.

    Scope set in the contract
  • Deliveries

    Sending a dossier to a client is an explicit action, designed to be traced.

    Scope set in the contract

Security and GDPR →

Open a score on your own mandate.

Describe a requirement: we show you what a decision dossier contains, source by source.